🔗 Share this article

For a brief period, Trump gave the impression to embrace a resolute position regarding Ukraine. Following delivering statements of "significant ramifications" last August should Russia's president continued hindering truce discussions, the former president ultimately imposed major restrictions on Russia's two largest energy firms, these major energy companies. This move seriously impacted the Russian leader's capacity to fund his war effort in Ukraine.

Yet, through his newly presented 28-point peace plan for Ukraine, that was created by both nations' officials without Ukraine's or EU input, the former president has seemingly reverted to his pro-Putin approach.

Benefiting Aggression

This plan would effectively favor Putin for invading Ukraine while putting Ukraine's democracy in peril. Despite ringing declarations that "The nation's autonomy will be upheld", much of the plan in reality weaken that very independence. This constitutes a Moscow's wish would likely be a Ukrainian nightmare.

Reflecting his real-estate background, the former president persists to consider the Ukrainian conflict as a simple border issue, like handing Russia a portion of Ukraine's territory will please the ruler. Yet, Russia's invasion is not only about dominating a destroyed area of deindustrialized territory in Ukraine's east. Instead, it's about the nation's political system – and Putin's clear intention to destroy it so it no longer functions as an appealing model for the Russia's population of the responsible government that his growing authoritarian rule prevents them.

Territorial Surrenders

While keeping in place the currently divided regions of Zaporizhzhia and Kherson, Trump's plan would compel the nation to surrender all of Donetsk province. Aside from rewarding the Russian Federation with territory that its forces have been unable to capture in more than a ten years of warfare, this giveaway would leave Ukraine's defensive positions dangerously compromised.

Donetsk is the site of Ukraine's well-known "defensive line", the well-established protective structures that constitute a critical barrier to enemy progress. The proposal would have Ukraine leave these defenses, providing Russian forces a open route to Kyiv if he subsequently opt to resume the war.

Defense Limitations

Furthermore, in a step that would enable future conflict easier for the Russian military, the plan would require Ukraine to diminish the size of its troops from their current large number soldiers to a cap of this lower number. Notably, the plan imposes no similar limits on Russia's military.

Seemingly as a gesture to Russia's attempts to characterize the nation's legitimate administration as Nazis, Trump's plan declares: "Any Nazi doctrine and practices must be rejected and banned." As if to highlight this element, it requires that "Ukraine will hold democratic votes in this period" of a ceasefire agreement. At the same time, the proposal imposes no requirement that Putin risk his authoritarian rule by allowing votes in his own country.

Protection Assurances

Admittedly, the proposal has Russia commit not to "invade other states" and to "incorporate in legislation its position of non-aggression towards Europe and Ukraine". However taking into account that Putin has violated similar accords in the past – including the Budapest accord, in which Russia pledged to respect Ukraine's sovereignty in return for surrendering its Soviet-era atomic arms, and the 2014-2015 Minsk agreements, in which Moscow promised to a ceasefire and a restoration of captured areas in the region to Ukrainian control – how should the international community believe this commitment this time?

That is why the Ukrainian government has been so adamant on external security guarantees. Although the plan promises a "decisive joint armed reaction" if Russia renew its invasion, and provides that "The nation will receive reliable protection assurances", the particulars range from fuzzy to alarming. The initiative would not only block the nation Nato membership but also prohibit member states from deploying troops on the nation's land, thus preventing the peacekeeping contingent, presumptively commanded by European powers, on which Ukraine had been counting to deter Putin from replenishing his weakened troops, rearming, and reinvading.

Global Reaction

A separate side agreement apparently would provide Ukraine with a similar to NATO security guarantee, in which any later "major, intentional, and ongoing aggression" by Russia on the country "would be considered as an act of war endangering the stability and safety of the transatlantic community." This indicates a armed reaction. However in contrast to a capable Ukraine's armed forces – Ukraine's best defense against additional hostilities – the success of the parallel accord would hinge on the dedication of Nato leaders, like the US administration, to react militarily to Russia's hostilities, an action they have {not